I was thinking of how the methods of communication have evolved .... from face to face, to letter writing to telephoning to email. Email romances are a modern phenomenon. The exchanges are so rapid, they resemble one on one face to face, with the major difference being that theres no face to face.
What do you think about the new phenomenon that today, you can meet someone for the first time on line, get to know them, have a relationship with them, based solely on words? What do you think is unique about this kind of communication?
Email is a verbal shorthand. Its a way of cutting to the chase. You tend to go right to the heart of the matter. You dont circle, like when people first meet each other, and theyre trying to impress each other. Theres a whole social construct that you have to work through. And its not a new phenomenon. You mention letter writing. People used to do that without meeting each other. But
now through email this is becoming so much more universal. I think the scope has become so
much larger with so many people online now, with the chat rooms, etc. It just widens to X to the
100th power the occasions that you have for meeting someone. In the chat rooms you have no
idea what sex the person is. They could have green skin,or a third eye in the middle of their forehead. There are 15 year-old kids pretending to be 40 year-old adults and vice versa. In a real life relationship you have all the boring day to day routine minutiae to contend with. The things that are absent from an ephemeral relationship. Ive spent a lot of time thinking about what this was all about. And I ve done a lot of analyzing it to understand what was going on. I would like to extrapolate by saying that thats what I think is going on with all these people.
Our modern life does more and more to cut us off from our primal self. It asks more and more
for structured civilized behavior. But an email relationship is not based on this everyday reality and
it can be difficult to maintain a proper perspective on a relationship when its not based in this everyday reality. Its based on some unknown inner needs, forces, drives, that are allowed to
express themselves through the communication. But even in the cyber world, where we are
corporal entities without bodies, communicating with each other, even there, I think there is a
hunger for ones authentic self, which weve been cut off from. I think there are large portions of
a persons subconscious that, at any given time, partially because of a survival mechanism and
partially because of what society dictates, are cut off. Wilhelm Reich calls it the emotional plague the cutting off from ones own feelings. In the drive to become civilizedweve had to cut ourselves off from a lot of our primal drives, forces, instincts. I think that in and of itself this is
both a good thing and a bad thing. Good in that it allows us to function and get our work done.
But on the other hand there is a force in people, an electricity, a vitality, that comes from the
subconscious that I think is important to have access to in a way that doesnt overwhelm us. Thats what I think consciousness tries to do. It only allows you access to a bit at a time, like
when youre doing a body of art work, you access your subconscious, but it comes out in a way
where you can measure it and control the flow. But there are other times when its like a tidal
wave that in some people leads to madness insanity when you cant stem the flow from the
subconscious. I dont think most people are aware of whats happening to them. Thats part of the thrill of what this communication is about.
I find it something of a paradox that as modern society does more and more to cut us off from our primal self, this new technology seems to be making the opposite possible.
This is so important to us and our well-being as a species our access to our subconscious mindsthat no matter what new technology is developed and what new culture is developed as a
way to cut ourselves off, theres going to be the opposite and equal reaction of a way to find
ourselves.
Sort of like a survival mechanism.
It is a survival mechanism. I think that this mechanism is part of what should be the crux of this
article:that there is a hunger in people for communication, for genuine connection with each other and people are going to find ways to do this. And yet for all the analysis and all the psychological reasons at the bottom of it is this desperate need to communicate, with the other person and with yourself. Thats why its important.
How did this experience lead to being expressed as a work of art? Back when this was occurring it was extremely tempestuous. I was having a difficult time emotionally, dealing with what was happening to me being in love with this person that Id never seen, and it seemed to me one of the only ways for me to keep my sanity was to make a work of art out of it. I thought that it would help me work through my feelings.
Did this body of work come easily, did it seem to take on a life of its own, or did it have to be forced out?
Oh no, it took on a life of its own absolutely once I got the form in which I wished to work
which was the feminine bodies being intersected by the railroad tracks. And once I also realized
that I was going to be approaching other people and getting them to write stories to integrate with
the images it did completely take on a life of its own.
How was it that you arrived at the train motif? And how did the train work in to all the stories?
The wail of a train late at night is to me the sound of someone leaving. But it was a lunch time conversation with Mark Toal, another digital photographer and writer of one of the series stories
I Couldn t Stay in Miami, that gave me the idea to include the stories. I was discussing with him
the motif of the women and the train tracks. He said,That reminds me of a time when I had to leave someone on a train. And he told me this story of an episode in his life that had been very painful. When he finished telling me his story it was so obvious to me what I had to do.And I said can I use this story in the image? Thats when I got the idea of going and asking other people to write their stories. The train motif was a device. I asked every author if at all possible, to work a train into their story.
Was the making of this series therapeutic, that is, did it help you understand what was happening to you?
Yes. It took me away from the personal relationship between myself and the other person and put me into the larger world of artistic endeavor and also into the world of other peoples stories of abandonment. And I realized that I was not alone. That abandonment was a common thread that most people in the world have experienced at onetime or another in their life; by a lover, a parent, a dog dying. That there are so many levels of the experience of abandonment. This helped me to understand that this was archetypal rather than personal.
So my work became a mirror for other people, which to me is the most effective means of artistic
endeavor, where its open ended so the viewer can project whatever it is they need to into the art.
Another quote at the beginning of Ritual of Abandonment best explains what I think this work is all about:
When a myth is enacted in a ritual performance or, in more general, simpler and profaner fashion, when a fairy tale is told, the healing factor within it acts on whoever has taken an interest in it and allowed himself to be moved by it in such a way that through this participation he will be brought into connection with an archetypal form of the situation and by this means enabled to put himself into order.
Emma Jung and M.L Von Franz, The Grail Legend
That quote is inviting an interactivity so that one may be healed from what one experiences.
Its been a great experience for me to have my work online and get communication from people
all over the world, wanting to talk to me about Ritual of Abandonment or my other bodies of work. I would like to conclude with this story: Back in 1995, when art on the web was in its infancy, there was a thing called cool site of the day.
Back then it was a big deal. On April 4th, my site, Ritual of Abandonment was chosen. I had
something like 10,000 people visit me that day, and I had all kinds of emails. One of them really stuck in my mind. It was from a father who wrote that he had gone to cool site of the day, not
knowing what to expect. But when he started going through it and he realized what is was, he called his son over. His son was going through the breakup of his first love and was very unhappy.
So father and son sat down and went through Ritual of Abandonment together. The father wrote me saying how meaningful it was for the two of them to be able to experience it together, and how it helped his son deal with what he was going through. These words were so gratifying. It could have just as easily been an angry father saying, What are you putting this nude art on the web for? Then the father went on and said how we all spend our lives going through these rituals of
abandonment."
|